Imam’s Involvement Not Fitting For National Prayer Service

How did a well-known Muslim Brotherhood-connected Imam receive an invitation to speak at President Trump’s prayer service at the National Cathedral? The only explanation is that a rat must be in the inner circle.

It is no secret, at least to those who understand the threat of the Islamic movement in the United States, who Imam Mohamad Majid is and what his connections are. All the more alarming is his position as head Imam of the All Dulles Area Muslim Society (ADAMS) as well as the president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA).

The ADAMS Center is one of the most Sharia adherent Mosques in the country and according to US District Court documents, ISNA was involved in funding terrorism.

ISNA is the largest Islamic organization in North America. In 2008 they requested to have their name removed from a list of unindicted co-conspirators from the biggest terrorism financing trial in the history of our country, The Holy Land Foundation trials. Thankfully the motion was rejected.

The United States District Court response to ISNA’s motion for equitable relief said this:

“Even if their filing were timely, which it is not, Petitioners’ motion would be moot. During last year’s trial, numerous exhibits were entered into evidence establishing both ISNA’s and NAIT’s intimate relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood, the Palestine Committee, and the defendants in this case. Accordingly, there is no possible basis for petitioner’s “expungement” from the Government’s list of co-conspirators and joint venturers. Even sealing the co-conspirator list at this juncture would be futile – the evidence has been appropriately introduced during the course of a public trial.”

Yet despite this man’s shady involvement with the Muslim Brotherhood who is HAMAS, Majid was appointed to the Department of Homeland Security’s Countering Violent Extremism Working Group by Obama. And according to Discover the Networks,

“Magid was authorized to train and advise personnel affiliated with the FBI and other federal agencies. He soon became a regular visitor to the White House, and merged as perhaps the most influential and sought-after Muslim authority in the United States.”

So, not only was Imam Majid given access to our national security apparatus, but a leadership role directing how our law enforcement would be trained to fight Islamic terrorism. You really can’t make this stuff up, and as many have said before me it is a case of the fox guarding the henhouse.

After understanding just a little of this man’s background and involvement with the Muslim Brotherhood, a group seeking to undermine our Constitution in order to establish the Caliphate through Sharia Law, one could appreciate the anger of seeing him praying in the National Cathedral last Saturday.

According to Center for Security Policy,

“A new group, Faith Leaders for America (FLA), has just issued a strong statement opposing Imam Mohamed Magid’s inclusion in the service attended by the President and Vice President this morning at the National Cathedral.”

The FLA presented their concerns about the Muslim Brotherhood in America the day before President Trump’s inauguration. Their statement to Trump follows,

“We want you to know you have our prayerful support as you begin to counter jihad and protect Americans from Islamic terrorism. When you label the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization, we support you.”

More importantly, who invited and vetted this Imam in order for him to participate in a prayer service for our country and newly elected President Trump? This is troubling when you consider President Trump vowed the day before in his inaugural address to rid the world of radical Islamic terrorism.

Only two angles are possible here, either the person making those executive decisions within the transition team is ignorant of this very real threat to our Constitution by the insidious Muslim Brotherhood or they are complicit in their goals. Either way, someone should answer for it, and Imam Majid should not be given one iota of access to President Trump.

We are in a battle for the heart of our country in many areas. One of those is an Islamic infiltration of our government in the form of The Muslim Brotherhood/HAMAS front organizations. The war cannot be won against Islamic ideology if we allow the heads of those groups to have leadership and prominent positions in our national security sectors and be given time to speak and “pray” over our new President and his administration.

President Trump gave the government back to We the People, so we need to demand that it be free of the influence of our enemies. The best way forward is to have the Secretary of State declare The Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organization.

This declaration would free our law enforcement to pull those members out not only of sensitive areas in our government, but from Mosques throughout this country who continue to preach hate towards Western Civilization as well as encourage jihad on our soil.

It is up to us to make America great again. This cannot happen if we continue to shelter the enemy, and allow people to grant the Muslim Brotherhood protected status in Trump’s new administration.

*Incidentally the ADAMS center just purchased land to build a 22,400 square foot Mosque in Prince William County, Virginia.

Has Florida Forgotten Jihadi Pulse Attack?

You would think Florida would be the last state that would welcome a Syrian Cleric who advocates the death penalty for homosexuals and holy war against Jews and those in the West. Apparently the Islamic Center of Pinellas County near Tampa, Florida has put the Pulse jihad attack behind them as they choose to invite this “world renown scholar” to speak January 6, 2017.

Syrian Sheikh Rateb Al-Nabulsi was welcomed by our State Department in 2014 to visit 17 different cities speaking and collecting money for the Syrian opposition to Assad. The Syrian American Council and Shaam Relief, partnered with the Muslim Brotherhood was integral in bringing him here to the US.

The approval of his visa occurred even though Al-Nabulsi was on video advocating for the death penalty for homosexuals, and was reported by the Inestigative Project on Terrorism as saying this,

“All the Jewish people are combatant. They do not have a career that a military rank does not encounter: doctor, pilot, engineer, for example, is a tank commander. Every civilian citizen. They do not have a regular army; they have a reserve army, and all the people can fight, so this is essentially an entirely aggressive entity from A to Z. This is the Sharia ruling.”

According to the New York Post the State Department defended their decision to admit Al-Nabulsi as one of their officials reported that visa requests especially from countries that sponsor terror get scrutinized. One official stated,

“Every visa applicant undergoes a screening to detect connections to terrorism, and that includes inputs from multiple federal partners.”

If these screenings are any indication of the scrutiny of the Syrian refugees are receiving, Americans should be extremely concerned for their personal safety and the security of the country.

If they can fail so badly when they have multiple sources of background information at their disposal, what kind of assurance do the American people have that they are making wise decisions with NO background information at all on the refugees and immigrants being allowed in our country?

How can a State Department with access to these open-sourced videos and documents not make decisions in the best interest of the American people? Why does the State Department still extend an open and welcoming stance to a Syrian Cleric advocating for the death of homosexuals 8 months following an Islamic jihad attack on a gay bar in Orlando, Florida?

The answer is simple. We have been under the direction of an enemy in the White House.

Prior to the Pulse jihadi attack, Alan Kornman with The United West, brought another Muslim Cleric, Iranian Sheikh Sekaleshfar, to the attention of WFTV 9 News in Orlando. This man openly called for the killing of gays as the compassionate thing to do, and spoke in Sanford, Florida at the Husseini Islamic Center.

So, here we are once again having to swallow the absolute deception of a President Obama who speaks out of two sides of his mouth and a State Department that has become impotent when it comes to protecting this country. Obama sets the tone for his duplicitous manner when it comes to Islamic terrorism and gay rights.

On the one hand he drapes the White House in rainbow colors, appoints a gay man, Eric Fanning, for the Secretary of the Army and names Stonewall a National Monument for gay rights. On the other hand, he courts the Muslim Brotherhood/HAMAS by allowing hate-filled clerics like Al-Nabulsi and Sekaleshfar who advocate violence against gays, to come and whip up the Muslims attending these Mosques and Islamic Centers into carrying out more atrocities on the American people.

The good people of Florida need to speak up against the Islamization of their state and demand that clerics like Al-Nabulsi turn right back around and go back to where they came from.

It is time for a new Secretary of State to designate the Muslim Brotherhood and all those front groups associated with them as a Foreign Terrorist Organization. Only then will our law enforcement be able to root them out and put a stop to the sponsoring of jihad promoting clerics and Imams from spreading their ideology of hate.

  • Al-Nabulsi Event Flyer: The Islamic Society of Pinellas County, “An Evening for Syria Dr. Mohammed Al-NabulsiMasjid Ebad Alrahman (904) 704-4381
  • Friday, January 6, 2017 at 7:30pm

Planned Parenthood Club Shouldn’t Be Welcome At High School

Cecile Richards greets participants at the Rally for Women's Health on Capitol Hill in Washington D.C. on July 11, 2013.

Cecile Richards greets participants at the Rally for Women’s Health on Capitol Hill in Washington D.C. on July 11, 2013.


Planned Parenthood isn’t happy unless they are harvesting body parts and ending the lives of perfectly healthy babies. To make sure they have a never ending supply of  fetuses they establish student groups on high school campuses to influence young impressionable girls. A recent addition is at a public high school in Richmond, Va.

The Maggie L. Walker Governor’s School is funded by Virginians’ state taxes. The esteemed school’s mission is,

“…to provide comprehensive educational opportunities that advance gifted students’ understanding of world cultures and languages. Our diverse and supportive community develops students’ character and ability to contribute, collaborate, and lead.”

The Governor’s school must consider Planned Parenthood to be a beacon of light to their students. Certainly the women’s reproductive center will help young students understand the character needed to undergo an abortion, not to mention the sacrifice of a human being in order to contribute to the greater good of the organization, which is all about the money.

Not only will the club educate the girls about their abortion rights, but will actively involve them “in the political process to win elections and pass pro-reproductive freedom legislation.”

Excuse me, but what the hell does that mean? Planned Parenthood is anything but PRO-reproductive. They are for killing babies, and making money no matter what. To top it off they harvest the baby’s internal organs for a handsome price. Has the country so soon forgotten the videos plainly showing their executives advocating for this?


This barbaric organization has no business stepping foot on public school grounds, not to mention being sanctioned as an upstanding club. I guess the parents who send their students to this school must heartily agree with the political leftists who are running it, or there would be a massive pushback against the formation of the club.

There is no doubt in my mind those who send their kids to these types of progressive schools are probably graduates from prestigious universities and other places of higher learning.

I wonder if the parents consider the health risks and emotional trauma to women and girls who undergo abortions? It is not only well documented throughout the world, but also common to hear of the regret when talking with those who have personally gone through them. In fact reports about a case study in Finland that states,

“The Finland researchers found that compared to women who carried to term, women who aborted in the year prior to their deaths were 60 percent more likely to die of natural causes, seven times more likely to die of suicide, four times more likely to die of injuries related to accidents, and 14 times more likely to die from homicide.

Researchers believe the higher rate of deaths related to accidents and homicide may be linked to higher rates of suicidal or risk-taking behavior.”

The fact is that abortions have many negative ramifications and predisposes those who have had them to psychological struggles later in life.

As a nurse who sees many patients taking anti-depressants and anti-anxiety medications, one wonders why parents would allow an organization access to their children who encourage practices that increase the chance of health risks down the road.

This is what happens in schools across the nation when parents fail to get involved in their children’s education. Whether it be the lack of understanding of the contents in the textbooks, to what kind of clubs are offered at the school, parents need to stay on top of what is being taught these days. We certainly can’t trust the liberals involved to make the right choices.

What is ironic and even more telling is the video embedded on the Wilder School’s website. It appears to be footage of a past graduation ceremony with someone singing Jim Croce’s “I Got a Name”. Interestingly enough, if you listen to the song, the lyrics say this:

“Like the north wind whistlin’ down the sky

I got a song, I got a song

Like the whippoorwill and the baby’s cry

I got a song, I got a song”

The sad thing is this school will be giving a foothold to an organization that wouldn’t allow the opportunity for that baby to utter one cry in this world. No, they would have snuffed the life out of him/her before that could take place. Apparently Planned Parenthood doesn’t believe everyone deserves the right to sing their song.

If anyone wants to talk about the real war on women, the war on humanity, I’ll be here waiting.

  • Those interested in contacting the school may find the info in an article by Rick Buchanan, in Fauquier Free Citizen.

Intelligence Officer Wants Answers From Comey

James Comey, FBI Director

James Comey, FBI Director

Letter from Jim McKinney, recently retired Army Foreign Area Officer.

Dear Director Comey,

I respectfully ask you to please clarify some things for me, and for the tens of thousands of security professionals who serve our nation every day. In reference to the former Secretary of State Clinton’s private email server, I read on CNN that you claimed in a memo that “…there really wasn’t a prosecutable case.”   Would your position stand for me if I had done the same?

I am a retired intelligence officer. If I ordered my staff to place an un-cleared private server in my home, had them forward my official government emails to that server, used unsecure remote devices to access that server, wouldn’t I be in violation of law or government security policies? If in those emails, held on that server, I either received or sent classified material, knowingly or unknowingly, wouldn’t I be in violation of the National Security Act? Wouldn’t I be risking national security? If my predecessors did the same would that exonerate me, or them?

I served as a Senior Defense Official/Defense Attaché during Secretary Clinton’s tenure, twice as a Security Assistance Officer at US Embassies, and in Counter-Terror and Special Operations organizations. I served in some of our nation’s most sensitive programs under the NSA, the NRO, and I worked with the CIA, FBI, Treasury and allied nations routinely. In 2013, I received the National Intelligence Award from the Director of National Intelligence, GEN Clapper, for intelligence operations.

I was also trained as a Special Security Officer (SSO) in the control and handling of classified material. In fact, the FBI SSO was in my SSO training class at the Defense Intelligence Agency. Her training was the same as mine. She was a good student, and honorable person.  I am pretty sure the FBI, as with all U.S. government agencies, still keeps a pretty tight handle on classified information.

A few years ago, a State Department colleague was given a security “violation” from our Embassy’s regional security officer – 2 or more “violations” will get you relieved. He wrote the 4-digit code to his door on a sticky note in his wallet, in Chinese.

His door was behind three locked doors, a Marine Guard detachment, a guarded exterior gated wall and video surveillance – all to protect Confidential (C) and Secret (S) data in locked safes, often sent from HQ in SEC Clinton’s name. A little extreme, but this security violation met security requirements under then SEC Clinton.

From all my experience, all my professional training, and all my expectations that our leaders would do the right thing to protect the security of our nation and the integrity of our government, I am confident I would be removed from my position, my clearance would be suspended, I would face prosecution and a likely conviction if I acted the same as SEC Clinton. I hope this would be the case for anyone.

What changed in three years since I retired? Has Congress changed our national security laws to allow incompetence? Has our government changed so much that we are now willing to provide exceptions in handling our most sensitive relations with foreign governments?

I am one of those “…people no longer in government…” you referenced as chest beating. I am not chest beating. I am truly trying to understand. I wonder why you had to send a memo to your staff to explain your decision. Shouldn’t it stand on its own? I wonder why you referenced former government officials. Do former government officials have no knowledge of these lenient new laws, or no right to speak? Is this a warning to those still in government service to toe the line?

You are an intelligent man. You must understand that by sending such a memo you are indirectly (or directly) sending a message to your staff to shut up and follow, regardless of their legal knowledge of the rules for handling classified materials and national security.

There is grave danger when a leader enforces loyalty over integrity. It’s not the best form of leadership. Loyalty over integrity undermines organizations, and it undermines confidence in government.

For me, every policy I followed, every risk to life I took, and everything I defended under five presidents is called into question with your decision to not recommend penalties for one of our national leader’s negligent acts.

How do I, and many Americans, keep faith in our government if there is such an appearance of gross inequality in our justice system on such a grand scale? I would humbly like to know. Your people in the FBI need to know. Those risking their lives for this nation today, and every day, need to know.

Divided or United? As Goes My Team, So Goes My Nation

FootballBelow is a letter by a good friend of mine. Please take the time to read.

Jim McKinney retired in 2013 as an Army Foreign Area Officer with over 30 years of service. He most recently served as a Political-Military Advisor to the Commander, US Army Central in the Middle East, Senior Defense Official/Defense Attaché to Slovenia, Deputy Chief of Combating Terrorism for US Pacific Command, and the senior Security Assistance Officer for US Embassies in Albania and the Republic of Georgia among many other special operations, counter-terror, strategic and tactical assignments around the globe.


Divided or United? As goes my team, so goes my nation.

My faith in the San Francisco 49ers organization is shaken after nearly 50 years of unwavering loyalty. The immature, elitist and divisive action of a single individual has soured my love of a team and a sport that I believe so much represents the struggle, the importance and the hope of America.

I never questioned my commitment to the 49ers, or my love of football, until this morning when I read of the disrespect for the National Anthem from an overpaid, underachieving, privileged and divisive professional athlete.

I am saddened so many Americans lack understanding of what the Anthem represents. I am saddened because this protest shows a failure leadership on our team, in our education and in our nation. So many have worked so hard, and sacrificed so much to improve America. We have come so far from the dark days of the past – we have done so much to make the world better.

Some of my best memories are of watching the 49ers. By 5 years old, I was hooked. I learned to respect the individual toughness, work ethic and rewards of putting one’s soul into what they believed. I saw the importance of unity and its effect on a team – division led to loss, unity led to success. As I grew, I began to understand the struggles on the field transcended the game – they were lessons for life.

Other memories in my early years were more frightening. My father, a cop, faced off against race riots, anti-war protests, shootings, and domestic bombings. Vietnam cost our nation self-confidence, our sense of security, our dignity, and sadly many of our bravest for little or nothing in return. The struggle for equality seemed insurmountable, but with good will and for the right reasons things changed. In all cases, the team that worked together best – with the right purpose, unity and willingness to sacrifice – won, and the divided team – without understanding of purpose, and unwilling to sacrifice – lost.

As a young soldier during the ’81 season, I watched the moment that would create legends and a dynasty – “the catch.” For me, the 9ers became America’s team, representing the work ethic, the synergy that makes good into great, and the reward for unity of purpose.

For the next decade, the 49ers made football better, as I believe America made the world better. The west-coast offense, four Super-bowls, the fall of the “Wall”, the collapse of communism – the protection of individual human rights became the standard, not the exception.

My wife and five children have traveled the world supporting my military career, and our team. They struggled overseas with the challenges few Americans will ever understand – move after move, unsafe food supplies, limited medical support, no electrical power or water for days at a time, and the threat of bombings, kidnappings or assassinations. But we served a good purpose, honed our strength, and maintained our unity – and we succeeded. We always kept faith in the 49ers, and in America.

My oldest son, Tristan, went to his first 9er game at two years old. I was assigned to Berlin, Germany. We watched the game in the Olympiastadion, the very stadium where Jesse Owens embarrassed the Third Reich in 1936, 55 years before. Later I taught him the importance of what happened in that nation so many decades before. And I taught him what happened in that city just the year before, as the example of healing divisions, standing for beliefs, and how important America was in the struggle against tyranny. America stood firm in Berlin for 45 years, for the right reasons.

My youngest son, William, plays football. No – he lives football. He works hard with a purpose – to play high school and college ball. His dream is to one day be quarterback for the 49ers. He has the toughness, the work ethic and the sense of purpose to get there. William and I were to meet Tristan and their bother Brennen to see the game Friday night.

Brennen was to fly in from FT Carson, Colorado. He left as a fourth year engineering student to serve our nation as an infantry soldier. He serves honorably for a cause our family believes in – defending this nation and our Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

My boys bought tickets for me – a Father’s Day gift. The last 49er game I attended was that 1991 Berlin American Bowl in a newly unified Germany. Friday’s game was the first in 25 years for me, and the first ever for Will and Brennen. We hoped for a good game, and mature leadership on the field, but mostly we just wanted to be together.

Unfortunately, my boys bought the tickets before Brennen received orders for Afghanistan. In a strange twist of fate, Brennen arrived at Camp Dwyer, Helmand province the 26th of August, the day of the game. In a quandary of loyalty and desire, I told my family earlier this week that we couldn’t go without him. I said we would find the money and the time to go when he returned, and go together. That was before the game.

After the game, my faith in my team – and in my America – was fully shaken. I served over 30 years in the defending the rights guaranteed to all US Citizens in our Constitution, and to make the world a better place. Freedom of speech is paramount – and I swore an oath to defend it with my life, if necessary. We are blessed to live in a nation that allows such protest. Like so many, I have lost good friends and close family in this never ending and epic struggle to defend these freedoms. My son this very moment is risking his life to defend the hopes and promises outlined in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. But we believe with free speech and expression come the responsibility to think before you act – and you reap what you sow. And we believe in unity, not division. To see the lack of leadership in my team, the lack of faith in our nation, as my son stepped onto the battlefield made me weep.

America is not perfect, but understanding the vision of our founding documents and respecting the laws, the institutions, and the people who sacrifice for them is essential for unity.

Trump Should Double Down On Muslim Ban

dome-of-the-rock-574488_1280-e1470349483128-7c0bb0f4206d63e226bdfde51e91b5371bc14995If America is at war with an ideology, would it not make perfect sense to ban those coming into our country who adhere to that same doctrine? Yet Trump was vilified by the left when he said last December that he wanted, “a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on.”

Some would argue that a religious test to screen immigrants is unconstitutional, but Andrew McCarthy disagrees and points out the religious litmus test was only to be used for those wanting to enter public office. He went on further to verify our right to vet immigrants through what their beliefs are. He said,

“And just as we have a right to consider the religious convictions of candidates for public office, so too do we have a right to require scrutiny of the beliefs of aliens who petition for entry into our country — a privilege we are under no obligation to confer. This includes beliefs the alien may regard as tenets of his faith — especially if such “faith tenets” involve matters of law, governance, economy, combat, and interpersonal relations that, in our culture’s separation of church and state, are not seen as spiritual.”

Trump’s vice presidential running mate, Mike Pence, has tried to soften Trump’s meaning by backing away from that original statement, as the Republican candidate for President has as well. They both seem to go back and forth from barring Muslims temporarily to banning all immigrants from countries sponsoring terrorism. In a recent radio interview Pence said,

“That’s what Donald Trump and I are calling for now, is to have a temporary suspension of immigration from countries or territories compromised by terrorism, and I believe that’s an appropriate action given the horrendous, horrendous violence that we see,”

However, Trump needs to double down on his suggested ban of Muslims. He needs to do this because it makes sense. Trump’s support and following grew huge because he made common sense statements that he didn’t apologize for, and he should continue to do so in the future. Americans, as a whole, are wary of politicians’ apologies. You can’t take one step in the political arena without stepping on them.

When Trump proposed the ban on Muslims he was essentially identifying who the enemy claims to be, something the Obama administration has yet to do. And no wonder, if you name the enemy, which in my mind is the Islamic ideology, then actions should follow that definition. This is why Obama will always steer clear of defining it.

Nobody wants to come out and say all Muslims are the enemy, but the ideology embraced by those responsible for committing terrorist attacks every 84 hours just happen to follow Islam. That is not some crazy coincidence.

The ban suggested by Trump is also why the left has bound together with the Muslim community to defeat Trump. After all, they can’t abide the thought of not coexisting with all the movements in America who are attacking God-given freedoms.

The left has to stick together, you know. Even in the face of all the Islamic terrorism with machetes, buses, knives, bombs and yes, even guns. They cannot allow themselves to come to grip with the fact that all of these attacks are driven and inspired by an ideology that is embraced by Muslims. That just wouldn’t fit their world view.

Wonder if those jumping all over Trump about being xenophobic, Islamophobic, etc., ever consider what is happening across the ocean in Europe? In fact there was a recent debate concerning the delegalizing of Islam in Poland. One of the debaters was Miriam Shaded, president of the Estera-Fund, who gave several points as to why Islam should be outlawed in her country. When asked her reasoning behind the criminalization, Shadad said,

“It is against the Constitution, those who leave Islam have to fear death. Islam calls for violence and its attempts to bring this system and ideology to power in certain countries, into certain structures-with the use of violence…Their approach towards women, discrimination, beatings, molestation, necrophilia, zoophilia, all that is legitimized by the Qu’ran.”

Her supposed opponent, Lesek Samorski, found it difficult to counter her reasoning and ended up agreeing with her as far as characterizing Islam, but differed as far as how to go about discouraging the criminal acts perpetrated by Muslims in Poland. He stated,

“…I am absolutely against what is happening now-the Islamic hordes that want to enter Europe…We had problems with them for centuries and we solved them with fire and sword.”

One thing is for sure, this debate over what to do with the Islamic ideology and Muslims who adhere to it is far from over. From deciding if Muslims should be banned from entry into the country, to deciding whether or not to allow them to legally follow the Qu’ran is a serious issue, and it must be determined.

Further, a discussion and study to whether Islam should even be classified as a religion verses a cult or a major political ideology needs to be happening in the public arena. And our leaders need to define the enemy and act accordingly.

A strong leader says what he means, and makes no adjustments. Winston Churchill said this about the religion, and nothing transformational has taken place within Islam since.

But the Mahommedan religion increases, instead of lessening, the fury of intolerance...It was originally propagated by the sword, and ever since, its votaries have been subject, above the people of all other creeds, to this form of madness.”

Right after the Pulse Islamic attack in Florida the Muslim ban had a majority of support by the Republicans, but has since waned. Americans need to come to a decision about whether they support the ban or not, and stick with it. And if public support continues to be fickle, Trump just needs to wait for the next jihadi attack to propose it again. We all know it is just a matter of time.


Russia and the Islamic Movement Desire a Lasting Syrian War

Putin MoonsThere can be no doubt that the Syrian war, which produces an overwhelming flood of refugees, benefits Russia by causing a destabilization of Europe, as well as the Islamic movement that profits by furthering the opportunity to establish its coveted global Caliphate.

According to General Phil Breedlove, Nato’s Supreme Allied Commander for Europe and the US European Command, the strategies being used by Russia and Syria are meant to increase the numbers of fleeing refugees in order to cause trouble in other countries. In some cases, attacks are planned to create the human flow out of the country.

In testimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee Breedlove stated:

“Together Russia and the Assad regime are deliberately weaponising migration in an attempt to overwhelm European structures and break European resolve.”

In fact, Anders Aslund, a Russian economic policy expert was interviewed in an article which talked about the Russian military bombing civilian areas in Syria to,

“increase the stream of refugees to Europe which brings the EU out of balance.”

Putin has many reasons to see the EU break apart and according to news outlets Moscow has been funding far-right groups in European countries like France and others for the purpose of undermining unity. And when the destabilization of nations is concerned,  it most certainly has to do with money, just ask George Soros.

Economic sanctions were placed on Russia by the EU after they bullied their way into the Ukraine in 2014, annexing Crimea in the process. And when the price of oil dropped significantly, it left Russia hurting economically.

According to the previous article, what better way for Russia to regain stature on the world scene than to see the EU crumble so Putin could take control of Ukraine and the Baltic States, bringing power and respect back to the Motherland. It also encourages the Russian people to put their faith back into their leader, who promised them a renewed since of pride.

Nothing seems to be working in his favor more than an influx of refugees creating unrest and chaos wherever they have gone, either by the obvious economic strain, rioting in the streets or being party to massive increases in sexual assaults. The same consequences of importing migrants served to push the British to exit the EU in the historic leave vote on June 23rd, 2016.

Aslund stated,

“Putin has orchestrated an organized destabilization campaign against the EU, and he is willing to see it through. The worse it is [in Europe], the better it is for Putin.”

On the other hand, the Islamic movement, whose two main goals are Sharia Law and the global Caliphate, must be celebrating as the hijra is being carried out by millions of Islamic refugees who are settling in Europe and America.

In addition, the immigration is largely funded by the United States and the EU which makes this a win-win situation for Islamic countries. They establish power in non-Muslim lands by unloading large people groups who will be fed, housed, and clothed by the host nation, while they increase their numbers.

Ann Corcoran’s book, Refugee Resettlement and the Hijra to America, explains:

Hijra means migration and, according to Islam’s doctrines and its quietly acknowledged organizational strategies, the goal of migration today is not peaceful assimilation to the political system and mores of the host country. Instead, the goal is jihad by non-violent means-known as civilization jihad or Islamization.”

The hijra is a means of changing the political and cultural landscape of a country by an increase in shear demographics. A perfect case in point would be the newly elected Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, a Muslim who happens to have extensive ties to terrorism. The change in England happened seamlessly with a steady flow of Muslim immigrants and refugees over several decades along with their high birthrate.

Corcoran quotes Dutch Parliamentarian and leader of the Party for Freedom, Geert Wilders,

“…[O]ne can see that the threat from Islam doesn’t just come in the form of Islamic terrorism by suicide bombers trying to wreak havoc in our cities. More often, it comes in the form of gradual and incremental transformation of our societies and legal systems, or what is termed ‘Islamization’ of our democratic societies by the vast growing numbers of Muslim immigrants who are importing Islam into our Western way of life.”

The argument could be made that ending the Syrian conflict may be as simple as shutting the doors completely to Muslim refugees wanting to enter Western countries. Encouraging countries like Saudi Arabia, who have taken no refugees, to accept responsibility for them may further expose the underlying reason for the continued war.

It is clear that Russia and the Islamic movement gain power through the enduring Syrian conflict, and their influence spells danger for Western Civilization. What remains to be seen are leaders who will rise up to stop Muslim immigration which may save our way of life.